|
|
(continued)
Globalization From Below
By Jeremy Brecher and Tim Costello and Brendan Smith
The movement
faces many potential pitfalls, and given the power of those it opposes, there
is no guarantee that it can actually modify globalization enough to preserve
people and environment, let alone to build a decent world order. But that
is more likely to be achieved by means of a movement that is unified across
the boundaries of countries, issues and constituencies than by any other approach.
Globalization from below has the potential to change the power equation. Rarely
in human history have ordinary people had such an opportunity to transform
the world for the better.
Draft of an
Alternative Program for the Global Economy
Commenting on the Battle of Seattle, Newsweek wrote, "One of the most
important lessons of Seattle is that there are now two visions of globalization
on offer, one led by commerce, one by social activism." Globalization
from belows vision has been articulated in scores of international statements
and above all in the movements own actions. The following summary is
designed to provide a win-win framework for the many constituencies converging
into globalization from below, providing ways that their needs, concerns,
and interests can be complementary rather than contradictory.
- Level labor,
environmental, social, and human rights conditions upward.
Globalization from above is creating a race to the bottom, an economic war
of all against all in which each workforce, community, and country is forced
to compete by offering lower labor, social, environmental, and human rights
conditions. The result is impoverishment, inequality, volatility, degradation
of democracy, and environmental destruction. Halting the race to the bottom
requires raising labor, environmental, social, and human rights conditions
for those at the bottom. Such upward leveling can start with specific struggles
to raise conditions for those who are being driven downward. Ultimately,
minimum environmental, labor, social, and human rights standards must be
incorporated in national and international law. Such standards protect communities
and countries from the pressure to compete by sacrificing their rights and
environment. Rising conditions for those at the bottom can also expand employment
and markets and generate a virtuous circle of economic growth.
- Democratize
institutions at every level from local to global. Globalization from above
has restricted the power of self-government for people all over the world.
At the heart of globalization from below lies democratizationmaking
institutions accountable to those they affect.
- Make decisions
as close as possible to those they affect. The movement for globalization
from below should aim to construct a multilevel global economy. In accordance
with the subsidiarity principle, power and initiative should be concentrated
at as low a level as possible, with higher-level regulation established
where and only where necessary. This approach envisions relatively self-reliant,
self-governing communities, states, provinces, countries, and regions, with
global regulation only sufficient to protect the environment, redistribute
resources, block the race to the bottom, and perform other essential functions.
- Equalize global
wealth and power. The current gap between the global rich and poor is unacceptable;
it is unconscionable to act as if it can be a permanent feature of the global
economy. It is equally unacceptable to assume that the rich countries of
the world can call all the shots regarding the global economys future.
Policy at every level should prioritize economic advancement of the most
oppressed and exploited people, including women, immigrants, racial and
ethnic minorities, and indigenous peoples. It should increase power, capability,
resources, and income for those at the bottom.
- Convert the
global economy to environmental sustainability. The world is in the midst
of a global environmental catastrophe. Ill-conceived economic activity is
disrupting the basic balances of climate and ecology on which human life
depends. Globalization is rapidly accelerating that ongoing catastrophe.
The sources of environmental destruction lie primarily in the wrongly developed
countries of the North and in the activities of global corporations in the
South. The only way to reverse this catastrophe is to halt the present dynamic
of globalization and meet human needs by technologies and social practices
that progressively reduce the negative impact of the economy on the environment.
- Create prosperity
by meeting human and environmental needs. Today, an estimated 1 billion
people are unemployed. Millions are forced to leave rural areas and migrate
to cities or around the world seeking work. Meanwhile, the worlds
vast need for goods and services to alleviate poverty and to reconstruct
society on an environmentally sustainable basis goes unmet. A goal of economic
policy at every level must be to create a new kind of full employment based
on meeting those needs.
- Protect against
global boom and bust. The era of globalization has been an era of volatility.
Its repeated crises have destroyed local and national economies overnight
and driven hundreds of millions of people into poverty. An unregulated global
economy has led to huge flows of speculative funds that can swamp national
economies. No one country can control these forces on its own. Yet neoliberal
economics and the major economic powers have resisted any changes that might
restrict the freedom of capital. Economic security for ordinary people requires
just such restrictions.
Jeremy Brecher
is the author of 8 books on labor and social history, including Strike! Brendan
Smith was until recently on the staff of Congressman Bernie Sanders (IND-VT).
Tim Costello is head of the Massachusetts Campaign on Contingent Work and
author with Brecher of the video documentary Global Village or Global Pillage?
(www.villageorpillage.org).
This excerpt from the book Globalization from Below: The Power of Solidarity
(Cambridge: South End Press, 2000; 800-533-8478; www.southendpress.org/books/global.shtml)
originally appeared in The Nation, December 14, 2000.
BACK
TO TOP
|
|
|