Why We're So Short On Democracy and Renewable Energy
Mike Ferner
When I was asked to speak on wind and solar and conservation alternatives and how these could help make the U.S. more secure by reducing our reliance on foreign oil, I replied that I wasn’t interested in talking about the topic directly, but would be glad to address it in a different context. I will put this very directly and simply: we don’t need more facts. We don’t need another truckload of data to convince politicians to do the right thing. What we need is the ability to govern ourselves so we can start making the kind of future we all know we want and need—one that will let us live in peace with our fellow humans, the Earth and other species.
In case you think
it’s a bit bold to say we don’t need more facts, here are a few
examples.
• In 1952—fifty years ago—the Paley Commission reported to
President Truman that, “Efforts made to date to harness solar energy
economically are infinitesimal. It’s time for aggressive research in
the whole field of solar energy—an effort in which the U.S. could make
an immense contribution to the welfare of the whole world.” The
report concluded that solar could play a greater role in energy production
than could nuclear power, and that an aggressive effort could heat 13 million
homes and offices by 1975.
• One year before that date, in 1974, even the Atomic Energy Commission
admitted that by 2000, solar could provide 30% of the nation’s energy
needs.
• In 1972, the American Institute of Architects published its study called:
“A Nation of Energy-Efficient Buildings by 1990.” Their study concluded
that readily available energy conservation measures installed in old and new
buildings would offer an energy supply greater than what we could get from
the Alaskan North Slope, or domestic oil production in the continental U.S.,
or an overly optimistic prediction of nuclear energy output.
And the reports go on, and on! All of these options, of course, create more jobs and are far better for the environment than what we ultimately chose to do.
The big question it seems to me is why? And the logical answer seems to be because we do not govern ourselves in America.
Yes, right here, in the land of the brave, the home of the free; in this fabled American democracy of story and song, officials from oil companies and electric companies write our energy policy—and our foreign policy in places like Iran and Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia.
Company officials from General Motors Corp. and the du Pont Corp. and tire companies and paving companies write our transportation policy. How else can you explain the way our clean, efficient, inexpensive, environmentally friendly mass transit systems were sold off to GM-controlled dummy corporations and then systematically destroyed? Replaced first with General Motors buses belching diesel fumes, and then with automobiles and expressways—killing our down-towns and central cities, filling and paving wetlands and farmlands, replacing the diversity of urban life with the sterility of suburbs?
Would a self-governing people living in a democratic nation do this to themselves?
Would we do this to our Earth, and then unleash our corporations to plunder the rest of the planet; write corporate governance laws disguised as trade agreements (GATT, NAFTA, FTAA); install murderous regimes to guarantee resource extraction and global control of markets?
I don’t believe we would. I believe we are much more intelligent and humane than that. The problem is—fable and song and hype aside—“we the people” don’t call the shots in this nation. We never have. And until we wrestle with that fact and what to do about it, we will repeat the Paley Commission study and the architects’ study every generation and never get closer to a renewable energy economy than we are now. Because ultimately it’s not about good data and persuasive arguments—it’s about power—who has it and how it’s used.
Is it important to build energy-efficient buildings? Of course it is. Is it important to push for solar energy development? Certainly. But deep down inside we also know something else. We know that the Earth and all the other species that live here need us to do more than build a nation of energy efficient buildings; develop more solar energy systems than the Paley Commission urged; even more than rebuild our mass transit systems. They need us—we need us—to figure out why we don’t govern ourselves now, what we must do to change, and ultimately how to win the power needed to democratically run our government and our economy.
A lengthy task? An arduous task? A revolutionary task? Of course it is—but what else will we do?
Remarks given
at the First Unitarian Church “Community Dialogue,” January 19,
2002. Mike Ferner, of Program on Corporations, Law & Democracy, may be
contacted at mferner@utoledo.edu.
April/May 2002
Terrorists
and Saints:The Wisdom of Ubuntu
Eric Sirotkin
US
House and Senate Legislation Banning Space-Based Weapons
Should
America Put Aside Guarantees of Constitutional Justice?
Representative Dennis J. Kucinich
Nurturing
Activism
Kelpie Wilson
Challenging
Corporate Power Enacting Campaign Finance Reform
Why
We're So Short on Democracy and Renewable Energy
Mike Ferner
Who
Will Stand for America? Citizen Groups Learning to Lobby Elected Officials
Bonnie Lock
Making
the Choice to Run for Public Office
Peter Buckley
Why
a Loser Gets To Run The Country: The Case For Instant Runoff Voting
Rob Richie
Military
Spending Grows, But Are We Really More Secure?
John Darling
Book
Review: The Best Democracy Money Can Buy
Ben Sekora
The
Globalizer Who Came In From The Cold
Greg Palast
Pipelineistan
Pepe Escobar
To
the Victors Go the Markets
Jordan Green
When
the Army Owns the Weather
Bob Fitrakis
Water
Water Everywhere, But Which One Should I Drink?
Awnee
A
Homeopathic Perspective on Strengthening the Immune System
Doug Falkner
Rogue
Valley Dharma Groups Present "Change Your Mind Day"
Julie Norman
A
Call to Rediscover the Intelligence in Nature
Rosi Goldsmith
Deep
Scars Can Be Healed
Peter Moore, MFCC, CGP
Cosmic
Calendar
Salina Rain
