![]() |
||||||
| HOME
| ABOUT
US | SUBSCRIPTIONS
| ADVERTISING
| PAST ISSUES
| LINKS |
||||||
Aug/Sept 2002 Deep
Sustainability Community
Owned Enterprise Police
State Measures Will Not Make Us Safe Can
Democracy Survive Endless War? A
Popular Revolt This November Turning
the Trolls to Stone: Strategy for the Global Justice Movement Navigating
the Tides of Change Dispelling
the Myths About Smallpox Observations
Of A Medical Revolutionary The
Emergence of Mind-Body Medicine A
Childhood Stolen and Redeemed Healing
Hints Flax
Seed The
Yearly Round The
Movie Mystic: "Beautiful Mind" Salina Rain |
||||||
|
A Popular Revolt This November? By Ted Glick Who would have thought it? Proposed legislation to somewhat re-regulate corporations passing Unanimously in the Senate? And yet thats what happened last July. Think political earthquake, or at least warning tremors. Of course, expecting the Democratic-led Senate to get to the bottom of the corporate fraud and crime scandal is truly wishful thinking of the highest magnitude. After all, as reported in the New York Times, 41% of the soft money, $449 million, given by corporations during the 90s was given to the Democratic Party. The party of the common man has thoroughly and voluntarily joined itself at the hip with big money. Its time for the progressive third party movement, and all those who consider themselves genuine progressives, to come forward with a clear program to address this crisis. Such a program must be coupled with renewed energy and activism so that on election day, November 5th, a message is sent loudly and clearly that a popular revolt is underway against the choices of evil, whether worst or lesser, usually given to the voters by the two-party duopoly. Below is my contribution
to the process of developing such a program: Progressives must seize the time! Most of us have been saying for decades, since at least the Ronald Reagan era, that corporate welfare, ideologically-driven privatization, huge tax cuts for the wealthy and widespread deregulation of business are fundamentally wrong. Their deeper roots lie in the absurd belief that pure, unregulated greed, the pursuit of great power and wealth regardless of human or environmental consequences, will somehow benefit everyone. This belief has been exposed for the lie that it is. Only a comprehensive and wide-ranging set of reforms can begin to reverse the tremendous damage caused by this legally-sanctioned lie. But these reforms will not happen unless the American people rise up and demand them. Instant Runoff Voting The November elections have the potential to become a referendum on two-party malfeasance in office. One and a half years after the five not-so-Supremes selected George Jr. to be President, there are still echoes of the bitterness expressed by some Democrats over Ralph Naders Green Party Presidential campaign. And as Green Party and other independent candidates move toward this years November elections, we can expect those echoes to become louder and stronger. This will especially be the case in those situations where independents and Greens are running for the US House or Senate, risking Democrats hopes of maintaining control of the Senate and winning back control of the House. Forget the fact
that virtually the entire U.S. House and Senate, Republicans and Democrats
alike, continue to give the Bush oil-and-war-men a green light to pursue their
so-called war on terrorism, a war that is having major negative
impacts around the world. Here at home it is bad for the economy, and it is
being used to further undercut basic civil and Constitutional rights. But this defensive strategy alone, this approach of constantly supporting Democrats no matter how bad they are, will never, ever get us out of the dangerous series of crises we are facing in this country and world today. Under Bill Clinton and environmentalist Al Gore, nothing, virtually nothing, was done about the crisis of global warming, not even making it a major talking issue. What happened to the peace dividend after the end of the Cold War? It was Clinton who wheeled and dealed to get NAFTA passed after it looked dead and gone under Bush Sr. We can all add to this list. Which is why, as someone actively involved in the progressive third party movement for over 25 years, it is difficult to take the attacks on us when we decide to run as candidates truly about progressive politics and do so as independents. We are aware of the risks. But we know that the bigger long-term risk is if we continue with a strategically bankrupt approach toward our undemocratic, two-party, corporate-dominated, winner-take-all electoral system. We believe, based on some very concrete, empirical evidence, that it is essential that the progressive movement build an independent electoral arm to complement all of the other non-electoral tactics we use. This has to be a central strategic objective if we are to come to a halt before we get to the cliff and reverse course. But Ive got an idea that might deal with this problem, might even lead to some joint work on the part of progressive Democrats, on the one hand, and Greens and independents, on the other, and perhaps even some Republicans. We need a new national organization, Democrats for Instant Runoff Voting. Seriously. Such an organization would be a way for Democrats who are critical of independent candidacies to channel those worries in a positive direction. Instant runoff voting, a fast-growing, grassroots movement, is a concrete way to deal with this problem. Under IRV, voters number their preferences, 1, 2, 3, etc., instead of voting for just one person. If no candidate wins 50% plus one #1 votes, then the #2, and possibly, other votes come into play. In this way, people can vote for the candidate they like the best without worrying that their votes will help elect the candidate they like the least (go to www.fairvote.org for more information). The city of San Francisco recently passed a referendum to establish IRV as their system for electing people to office. In August there will be a statewide referendum in Alaska to do the same. 51 out of 55 Vermont towns supported IRV at town meetings in March. The Nation, Newsweek, Time, USA Today and many other mainstream news sources are reporting on and/or supporting this development. If there was ever a time for this growing movement to become a big deal, this is it. Come on, progressive Democrats. Dont gripe and complain. If youre truly scared of us progressive independents, dont attack us, join with us to build a strong pro-IRV movement in states and localities all over the country. Lets deepen democracy! Ted Glick
is the National Coordinator of the Independent Progressive Politics Network
(www.ippn.org) and the Green Party of New Jerseys candidate for U.S.
Senate (www.glickforsenate.org). He can be reached at futurehopeTG@aol.com
or P.O. Box 1132, Bloomfield, N.J. 07003. |
Print-friendly version | |||||