![]() |
||||||||
| HOME
| ABOUT US |
SUBSCRIPTIONS | ADVERTISING
| PAST ISSUES
| LINKS |
||||||||
February/March 2008 Everybody Wants to Rule the World A Better World is Possible Cultivating Wholeness and Community in a Fragmented World Relearning What We've Forgotten The Welcome Home Project Marc Allen Diabetes: Inherently Treatable and In Many Cases Preventable Riding the Age Wave Radient Mind: Intervuew wuth author Peter Fenner Cosmic
Calendar |
||||||||
|
Radiant Mind Interview with author Peter Fenner By Carrie Grossman Whether it is called enlightenment, pure awareness, or the “unconditioned mind,” there exists an awakened state of pure liberation that is at the heart of every contemplative tradition. Peter Fenner, who studied as a monk for nine years with many notable Buddhist lamas, including Sogyal Rinpoche, Zopa Rinpoche, and Thubten Yeshe, believes this experience of boundless consciousness does not have to exist separately from our day-to-day “conditioned” existence. He teaches that we can learn to exist as unique individuals at the same time as we rest in a unified expanse of oneness with all existence in a state he calls “Radiant Mind.” Students in the West often feel frustrated in trying to follow the Eastern path to awakening, confused by seemingly vague or counter-intuitive teachings. Peter Fenner created the Radiant Mind practice to help us break through the obstacles that are often challenging for practitioners in our culture. What is “radiant mind” and how can we access it? Why is the experience of radiant mind important? What are “nondual” teachings? How can nondual teachings—such as those you offer in Radiant Mind—and psychotherapeutic methods inform each other? For a nondual perspective, psychother-apy can be helpful so long as we realize that it’s a bridge, that it’s a provisional path. From the nondual point of view a lot of psychotherapy is limited because it’s essentially focused on making us feel better about ourselves. In contrast, the nondual state is not about feeling good. When people begin to integrate the nondual experience in their lives, they invariably feel more serene, more open and more accepting, but these are by-products. What holds us back from the experience of radiant mind and what is a simple exercise that can be done to help awaken this awareness? So the way through the idea that something can stop us from experiencing radiant mind is to see that there’s nothing to get through, we don’t have to do anything. There’s no one to get through anything and nothing to obtain. The exercise, the practice as it were, is to really see that radiant mind is this, just this, the ineffable display of phenomena that’s indistinguishable from contentless awareness. When people speak about the nondual teachings, one major criticism is that the nondual view is an invitation to ignore our neuroses and conditioning. Can you explain how it is possible to rest in unconditioned awareness without escaping our psychological and emotional issues, or “spiritual bypassing”? Is it necessary to engage in “formal” spiritual practice in order to experience radiant mind? Can it be experienced without prior contemplative training? Prior contemplative practice can cut two ways. Contemplative practice helps people to be present to intense emotions, frustration, anger, elation, ecstasy, hope and fear without having to escape these feeling or act them out. That can be very useful when it comes to deepening the experience of nondual awareness. The downside of spiritual practice is that is also very easy to condition the belief that we need to practice in order to achieve the particular result we’re looking for. It’s quite difficult to practice without having any expectations. Why would we be practicing? But even the slightest expectation—of making progress on the path, becoming more peaceful, achieving nirvana—throws us into time and stops us from being totally complete right now, in this moment, without having to do anything. Spiritual practice can become an obstacle to realizing the unconditioned. When we realize nondual awareness we realize that it doesn’t have anything to do with spiritual practice, past, present or future. As some traditions say, it’s acausal. So the trick is to find a practice that efficiently shows us that there’s no thing to get, that it’s here, this is it, not as thing, but as a no thing, and so we don’t need to be practicing anything. This of course is the intention of things like Zen koan practice. We continue practicing until we realize that we don’t have to do what we thought we had to do! When we’re resting in nondual awareness it doesn’t matter if we’re practicing or not. It doesn’t make any difference. The experience can’t be enhanced or maintained so there no reason for any practice. But there’s no reason not to practice either. It’s possible to keep practicing; it’s just that we’re not getting anything out of it. We don’t need to because we’re in the ultimate state. Whether we look like we’re practicing or not, is just a question of how we’ve conditioned ourselves. You speak of the importance of integration of unconditioned awareness into the conditioned body-mind. How can we experience this kind of integration? We don’t need to think about how to integrate the nondual. It happens automatically. The simple fact that we spend time resting in unconditioned awareness predisposes our mind to return to this experience again and again. It’s like a gravitational pull, or a homing instinct. At a deep level, beyond beliefs and even priorities, we recognize the value of this experience. Having tasted it we know that it gives us everything we want. Deep down we know what’s good for us, what works, what lets us stop and rest and be complete with what it is. Without thinking about it we begin to restructure our lives in order to open up opportunities to be in our effortless, natural, uncontrived state. At a certain point radiant mind develops its own impulsion and we simply can’t stop the process of evolution and awakening. Our desires and preferences no longer get in the way. In the Mahayana Buddhist perspective the importance of cultivating loving-kindness and compassion for all beings is stressed. However, in the nondual perspective suffering is seen to be an illusion. How can we recon-cile these two views and offer compassion with the understanding that what we see is not real? So yes, from within the state of nondual awareness there’s no suffering. That’s clear. We just need to look at it. But that’s not to say that suffering is an illusion—there’s just no suffering. Because, as we see, the Mahayana goes onto say that there is absence of suffering. It would be an illusion if there was suffering and it was unreal. But in samsara there is suffering. So nondual awareness doesn’t tell us that suffering is an illusion. We can’t extract that from the experience. If nonduality meant that there was no suffering it would be a conditioned experience. Nondual awareness could only be presenced if suffering was unreal. Nondual wisdom says that it’s neither real nor unreal. People get confused with this and think that Mahayana says that suffering is unreal. But, as I said, this is only half of the picture. The nondual state—the bodhimind—contains and transcends samsara and nirvana. Within the nondual state we don’t experience that there’s no suffering, because freedom from suffering is a conditioned experience. In nondual awareness, we’re not suffering, and we’re not not suffering. So there is nothing in the bodhimind that stops the perception of suffering. The bodhisattva activity is to show that the suffering that they see is unreal. But how does that help the crystallized identity who is suffering? Some people resort to a two level resolution of the Mahayana discovery that suffering is neither real nor unreal. They say that suffering is possible at the conditioned level, and impossible at the unconditioned level. It’s real at the relative level and unreal at the ultimate level. This is a dualistic way of understanding the Mahayana. It’s an easy way out of the dilemma but it isn’t what the Mahayana is saying. The Mahayana is saying that suffering is unreal (if can’t be found) and that the absence of suffering is unreal, because it can’t be found either. There are no two levels. This is how it is. This is the end of the story. We look using the “clear seeing” of vipashyana and this is what we see. So what does this mean in relationship to how bodhisattvas relate to the suffering of sentient beings? The bodhisattva (the being who’s functioning from bodhimind) totally gets that someone is suffering—they get it in a completely unfiltered and undistorted form, because they see straight through the illusion that there’s a state or way of being that’s free of suffering. They know that it’s impossible to find a state that’s free of suffering. And at the same time, and in the same way, and at the same level, they see that there are no samsaras (no states of suffering). They know that nothing can be found—samsara (suffering) and nirvana (its absence) are always unfindable. This is what they bring to the world. The inseparable union of compassion (the absolute knowledge that freedom from suffering doesn’t ultimately exist) and wisdom (the knowledge that ultimately there is no suffering). Within the bodhisattvas wisdom eye there is neither suffering nor freedom from suffering. So how do we get inside this? How do we get inside the mind of the bodhisattva? Actually, we don’t have to get inside the mind of the bodhisattva. All we have to do is enter radiant mind, and see what’s happening. Radiant mind is the mind of the bodhisattva. Suffering is like a perturbation in the field or expanse of awareness. This perturbation is known and experienced as suffering by a crystallized identity (a person) who has particular needs and preferences. In a sense the bodhisattva bring to this perturbation (someone’s suffering) the reflexive awareness that suffering is unfindable, and that freedom from suffering equally cannot be found. Is the presence of such a perturbation a problem? No. The bodhimind is not free of suffering. No one ever said it was. So there’s no problem here. There’s no suffering in the bodhimind and no freedom from suffering. So it’s completely consistent for the expanse of awareness to crystallize in this way and for people to suffer in the myriad of ways that they do—through illness, fear, madness, death, etc. And at the same time the bodhisattva know that none of this is happening. There’s no illness, no fear, no such thing as madness, and no death! There’s no invalidation of suffering. The bodhisattva doesn’t think, “Oh! Those poor suffering beings. They are suffering. They don’t realize that suffering is an illusion. I have to show them that it is all an illusion.” That’s not how it works. There’s no difference in the bodhi-mind between self and other. There’s no inside and outside … Suffering is real. There’s no question about it. When we’re hurting and in pain, it’s real. We can’t say it’s not happening. Actually, it isn’t happening, but we can’t say it’s not happening. It is happening. We relate to it as though it is unquestionably happening, and at the same time we know there’s no suffering. And it’s this knowledge that let’s us bring people through to the same awareness. This can sound a little weird but this capacity is the heart-essence of the bodhisattva path. Compassion validates the reality of suffering. Nondual wisdom sees right through it. The truth is that it is neither real nor unreal. This is why Mahayana emphasizes the importance of realizing the nonduality of wisdom and compassion. One without the other produces a bias in our relationship to suffering—our own and others. If there’s too much compassion at the expense of the wisdom of emptiness we get caught up in our own and others’ suffering. If there’s no compassion, if we think that suffering is an illusion, we disconnect from the pre-dicament that thousands and perhaps innumerable beings find themselves in. But the truth is that we don’t have to worry about integration, or getting the right balance of wisdom and compassion, because in radiant mind nondual wisdom includes the realization and actualization of compassion—the knowledge that there is no real or immutable freedom from suffering, Peter Fenner, Ph.D. is founder of the Center for Timeless Wisdom, and the author of numerous books, including Reasoning into Reality and The Edge of Certainty. He has taught workshops at Stanford Medical School, Columbia University, and elsewhere. His new book Radiant Mind is available from Sounds True Publishing (www.soundstrue.com).
|
Print Friendly Version | |||||||
|
Peter Fenner |
||||||||