![]() |
||||||
| HOME
| ABOUT US |
SUBSCRIPTIONS | ADVERTISING
| PAST ISSUES
| LINKS |
||||||
Ten Ways to Stop Corporate Dominance of Politics By Fran Korten It’s not too late to limit or reverse the impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission which allows unlimited corporate spending in politics, and which just may be the straw that breaks the plutocracy’s back. • Amend the US Constitution to declare that corporations are not persons and do not have the rights of human beings. Since the First Amendment case for corporate spending as a free speech right rests on corporations being considered “persons,” the proposed amendment would strike at the core of the ruling’s justification. The push for the 28th Amendment is coming from grassroots groups such as Public Citizen, Voter Action, and the Campaign to Legalize Democracy. • Require shareholders to approve political spending by their corporations. Public Citizen and the Brennan Center for Justice are among the groups advocating this measure, and some members of Congress appear interested. Britain has required such shareholder approval since 2000. • Pass the Fair Elections Now Act, which provides federal financing for Congressional elections. This has the backing of organizations representing millions of Americans, including Moveon.org, the NAACP, the Service Employees International Union, and the League of Young Voters. The heads of a number of major corporations have also signed on, including those of Ben & Jerry’s, Hasbro, Crate & Barrel, and the former head of Delta Airlines. • Give qualified candidates equal amounts of free broadcast air time for political messages. This would limit the advantages of paid advertisements on television where most political spending goes. • Ban political advertising by corporations that receive government money, hire lobbyists or collect most of their revenue abroad. Many have observed that the Court’s ruling will allow foreign corporations to influence US elections. Sen. Charles Schumer (D-New York) and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Maryland) are exploring this option. • Impose a 500 percent excise tax on corporate contributions to political committees and on corporate expenditures on political advocacy campaigns. Representative Alan Grayson (D-Florida) proposes this, calling it “The Business Should Mind Its Own Business Act.” • Prohibit companies from trading their stock on national exchanges if they make political contributions and expenditures. Another one from Grayson, which he calls “The Public Company Responsibility Act.” • Require publicly traded companies to disclose in SEC filings money used for the purpose of influencing public opinion, rather than for promoting their products. Grayson calls this “The Corporate Propaganda Sunshine Act.” • Require the corporate CEO to appear as sponsor of commercials that his or her company pays for, another possibility from the Schumer-Van Hollen team. • Publicize the reform options, inform the public of who is making contributions to whom, and activate the citizenry. If we are to safeguard our democracy, media must inform and citizens must act. These measures will not be easy, but grassroots anger at this latest win for corporate power is running high. History shows that when the public is sufficiently aroused, actions that once seemed impossible can, in hindsight, seem inevitable. From YES! Magazine (www.yesmagazine.org), a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas with practical actions. |
||||||
Feb/Mar 2010 Living in a Time of Mythic Chage The Value of Whole-Systems Design Playing for Keeps Motion to Amend Abolish Corporate Personhood Ten Ways to Stop Corporate Dominance of Politics What's a Patriot to Do? The Transition Document Community Gardening in an Urban Garden Cooperative On Planting Trees A Cooperative Model for Community Supported Agriculture Move Your Money The Mouth of Satisfaction Southern Oregon Birth Connections Cosmic Calendar Movie Mystic |
||||||
| Print Friendly Version | ||||||